Others are often telling that they read my eyes and analyze my thoughts to get into crimes in my motivational system, altought this does not have to be material.

They rely on my eyes being holograms, and me accepting people trying to communicate on street.

Although I do accept people communicating me on street with eyes, it follows the rules of love or starting a conversation: yes, one often does this intuitively, but only if the other side does agree. Thus, it works inside friend circles and not as a "civil right" - it's a big, shamy mistake to start conversation if you are not invited, although conversations start often with no words and signs. This is not a paradox, because people know the same-minded.

My eyes are holograms and I do take this seriously, we have science for this, legal rules etc. in North. Sorrily, talking about that is not scientific or legal thing, and it's not that people who do not read my eyes properly start teaching others:

• Reading the eyes is not scientific.
• Talking about this is absolute bullshit.
• Like in freedom of word, spiritual things are managed within spiritual realm, because they do not materialize immediately.
• Spiritual things, like love, are secrets: we do not talk about it. Any words are lies, in any explanation or try to rationalize this.
• Talk can only be poetic and symbolic, by metaphor, because eyes do not express otherwise. For example it's legal to explain this in zen buddhism or Viking style as symbol or metaphor: stories are real, but only as long as you do not talk.

These stories never say they express real truth, but only metaphor.

• Scientific base rule is applied: rational and spiritual reasons, just as rational and emotional explanations, are not mixed together.

As science is communication chakra, but this is the third eye chakra: third eye chakra is secret to those, who do not understand, and it's not a paradox if some people can not participiate in conversation - it's not a conversation, but alchemy, and it only relates to natural flow.

They think I am trying to convince someone, in something they do not understand: no, I strictly let the alchemy work with others, who have hologram eyes. Auras (such as dark aura), holograms etc. can only be carried through by spiritual realms and rules.

Existence of such eyes in any particular truth is not scientific: although the existence of such thing is very scientific, especially in Viking, Buddhist lands, africans etc., the actual reality is symbolic and not scientific. One can not read my eyes, about things I did not tell, and "try" to understand: in reality, we do not understand the hologram, but rather it works on it's own.

In spiritual realms, legal laws exist, and some kind of "professionals" can not criticize:

• In each case, material evidence is collected in normal ways, and national traits to express some sensations with holograms do not count. This was made illegal when we debunked the pope with their eye-readers army, who though they are fighting with something. On this, spiritual professionals do work, such as services of CIA and KGB, and they do take professional responsibility; it's well-known fact that the material effort is always taken separately, and talking plainly about something in spiritual realm can not legally be analyzed and rationalized, because it's not rational content - it's a symbol, metaphor and poetry, and to be discussed in form of Zen, or any ancient culture.

I asked from copilot (with little joke in the end): Explain the laws and practices, the Northern method, where spirituality is free, and the Spanish, where now again the people try to make legality based on thoughts or eyes, just as in the days of violent popes and inquisition. They say they "can not be involved otherwise", and have human rights or need to enforce laws, but they are sensitives like

bullshit - exactly what they accuse in. Where anti-spiritual is a debunkable, not spiritual, the same laws hold in opposite (if I don't talk, they have nothing to talk). Talk in context of international, spanish or northern laws, traditions and practices, also the failures of history such as extreme cases of anti-which or anti-pagan activity, for example where Vikings necessarily eat humans because they read eyes.

Spiritual expression in Northern Europe is often protected as a private, symbolic realm, while in Spain, historical and legal tensions persist between religious freedom and state oversight—especially when spiritual or symbolic behavior is misread as legal evidence.

Let’s unpack this through three lenses: legal frameworks, cultural traditions, and historical failures.