This now is an introduction to my Laegna system. It’s practically designed math - where the scientific world might benefit from limitless infinities, they must consider that for their own practical purposes they need a real number. My number are charged with symbolic energy.

Update: I just found this song and thought I add it here, in case you want something to do if the text is scarily long - it’s definitely inspiring. The site just appeared too gray and senseless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-_vF1RxMR0

And for Video Introduction:

https://vimeo.com/1135382640?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci

Steve AI

This was invented by an A.I., some nice myth:

https://vimeo.com/1135397798

This is the google drive of my AI video experiments, currently not with very proper file names - probably I add here sometimes and clean up the content:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1j6a3WM0oaCTtg4nq4iX1_GUwtNgVGU2z?usp=sharing

Here is the youtube channel:

Tambet Väli

What the Laegna documents cover and how to classify them:

• This document itself is introduction to Laegna, and Spireason or Laegna Spireason. It wants to build the important theorems, parts in special blocks with Lamps in Notion.so interface; it removes the complexities and reduces it into theorems, introductions to related materials - also rather simplistic, or in case of Tao and I Ching only the simplistic view of factual material of having 4 related symbols is used, not necessarily the full deep content in first place. Theorems are surrounded by related materials. While Laegna is the basis for Logecs and Linguistic enchancements of Language to support 4-based logic and related linguistic structures; Spireason is reasoning inpired by Laegna math and intellectuality, and connecting spirituality with reason. In this document, the spiritual reasoning creates a small model world of theorem framework, where it does not “know” what is not available for the first basic introduction. For example, we don’t know in this part, whether consciousness exists, because based on even human structure of atoms and electrons, we don’t see any clear attribute to just prove this in terms of simple “squares of logic and circles of math”; so this is the introduction and here we “know” rather Laegna basics, and for proofs we build very simple machines. As this is not any deep search for consciousness, but rather the theorematic framework which appeared when simplifying something complex and reducing it to rather trivial information, not losing it’s balance but having an “axiomatic system” - some base theorems, lamped blocks, explained around with necessary background even from western rather pre-Laegna philosophy, mystics and logic; the skeleton or back-bone appears here. Leaving out the complexities of math and life, this should be pre-school thing which even children would understand; for example simulated machines are simple and can be replaced with cartoons, movies or stories, where the deduction is simple and it’s rather illustrated well, than filled with all the reasons - I don’t see why you cannot express so simple thing with illustrations and a few words, or why I could not understand the theorem of karma and nature of life when pre-school. Also, these things here could be quite directly translated to Coq or Isabelle, as they lack some deep content, and look like proofs of meaning of life or other things, which rather follow theorems of biology, of systems, than deep introspections of nature of consciousness. One proof, also, instead of heavy numbers tends to contain one or oppose two conceptions, with two or three additional details, and so simple systems could be understood by children as base of their lessons. Spireason basics, being so simple could be so trivially come from Logecs that it’s also base theory of Laegna - but still, Laegna is also a free system of math and language, where specific proofs could be replaced with better proofs and more decent theories without any part of the language itself getting lost.